I don’t
speak French, so there is no pretence when I say “Plus ca change, c’est plus le
meme chose” sounds more exotic and poetic than the English equivalent, “the
more things change, the more they stay the same.” I only know what it means
because of a Rush song, but I've already used that title in a previous post, also on Windows. Imagine that.
Either
way, Windows 7 – so long evolved from Windows 3.11, Windows 95. Windows 98.
Windows ME. Windows XP. Windows Vistahahahahaha - has all kinds of slick new
features…but for all those number that have changed…one thing remains utterly
the same.
It’s Windows. Smh.
It’s Windows. Smh.
The
Comment
When I
first started researching and discovering Ubuntu/Linux, one of the reviews I
read from a much more tech-inclined reviewer resonated with me. He wrote “I
like Ubuntu because, once I’ve set things the way I like, they stay that way,
they don’t ‘just change’," (oh, how I wish I could find that comment out there in cyberspace; you'll just have to take my word for it that that's what I read).
This
comment was contributed to a discussion started by someone who was frustrated
with his Windows experience, wanted to switch, but didn’t know in which
direction to look for a less stressful alternative. So, folks were discussing
various reasons why they prefer Ubuntu and offering suggestions as to why
someone might enjoy appreciate Ubuntu as opposed to Windows, and in fact was a
swing at Windows, which essentially was being accused of changing things even
though the user didn’t request any such changes.
I
remember this comment because of its poetic understatement. Other people were
talking about Ubuntu’s media support, how much the out-of-the-box tools were so
much better/more stable/easy to use. There seemed to be an almost “thou-dost-protest-too-much-ness”
about all the whiz-bang cheerleading…until this quiet, very non-glamorous,
relatively pedestrian comment was made about user settings. Whoopty-doo,
settings don’t change – could that really be a even be called a feature? Let
alone one worth mentioning?
And, thus
am I reminded.
New
machine. New OS. Same old BS
I have a
fairly new work laptop with an Intel Core i5 processor, 8GB of RAM…and Windows
7 64-bit. I like to have it automatically go into Sleep mode when I close the
lid, and wake from Sleep mode when I open the lid; so, I configured the
settings to do this. And it works beautifully…for two days.
On day
three after taking it out of the box, I closed the lid, headed out on my
commute home and, when I get home and opened the lid, the computer was still on
– I had just enough time to see this before (you guessed it) the computer went
into Sleep mode.
All the
settings I originally set, way back all of not quite 72 hrs before, had not
changed. One should therefore expect that the operating system would operate
the system consistently with the settings that had been set. But, in the world
of Windows, that’s apparently asking too much.
Civilization
I
remember a colleague, a Mac loyalist, once said to me “look at my MacBook – you
see all the programs I have open? I booted up this machine 9 months ago, I’ve
never had to re-boot. I open it, it’s on instantly, ready to work; it’s always
on and always ready to work. You’ve had to re-boot your system more times this
week than I have in over a year, and I run many more resource-hogging programs
than you do. You Windows guys think “re-booting” is just a part of using a
computer, but you’ve been hoodwinked because, here in Mac civilization, it’s
not even a part of our vocabulary. You have no idea.”
It’s not
fair…it’s not my fault
And, he
was right. I can’t imagine it. Just last night, I overheard while a man at a
table near me attempted to complete a presentation for a client. He opened up
his Windows laptop (different make than mine, but Windows 7 just the same) and
plugged his internet stick into the USB, and it wouldn’t work. Later, he
attempted to plug in a portable printer….and it didn’t work. But, he knew what
to do – re-boot. Which he did, after which the stick and the printer both
worked.
That
reminded me of a funny bit from The Empire Strikes Back (I refuse to even
mention the reverse-engineered “Episode V" claptrap). Han Solo was convinced he
had the hyper-drive fixed on the trusty old Millennium Falcon. He pulled the
lever, nothing happened. Leia rolls her eyes while he yells “it’s not fair,
it’s not my fault.”
They stop at the Cloud City to have the Falcon checked out by the previous owner, Lando Calrissian. Stuff happens, and we end up back in the cockpit of the Falcon, but this time Leia's riding shotgun with Lando, who had his guys fix the Falcon. So, when he pulls the lever…nothing happens. As they scramble under Empire blaster fire, he yells “it’s not my fault.
Different
mechanics. Different pilot. Same old Falcon.
Different laptop manufacturer.
Different user. Same old Windoze.
The
aftermath
Minute
after hour after day of use grappling and fighting with an operating system
that causes frustration, lost productivity and stress can’t be good. Thus I
find that, indeed, what appeared at first to be a most innocuous comment
emerged as among the most insightful, +shining examples of the gap between
Windows and other operating systems out there.
Meanwhile,
I’ve changed my settings. Now, the power button has been set so that, when I
press it, the computer will go into sleep mode. I deliberately did not choose
that setting previously because I needed the power button to just shut down
Windows and turn off the computer when (not “if”) the operating system froze
and would not respond to CTRL-ALT-Delete. Our IT guy at work said, “No worries,
you can press the power button to go into Sleep mode, and press-and-hold the
power button to shut it down and power it off.”
Which is
a relief. Because I’ve got to be able to re-boot, right?
What’s
new?
0 comments:
Post a Comment